Home Page
04.30.2008 (previous)
The "Loud Minority" in the FOSS Movement

A ZDNet report on the "loud minority" in the FOSS Movement.

Efforts to increase the adoption of open-source software are being derailed by the efforts of a "loud minority" within the community who have made personal attacks on individuals who have expressed doubts about the software, according to one of the open-source movement's main advocates.

Jeff Waugh of open-source advocacy group Waugh Partners was disheartened after a series of personal attacks directed at the heads of Australian government agencies. These included comments directed at Australian Taxation Office chief information officer Bill Gibson...

Some of the public responses to the article labelled Gibson a "bureaucratic parasite" and his concerns "short-sighted".

While Waugh believes the open-source model holds better security outcomes than its proprietary equivalent, he describes the vitriolic reaction to Gibson's comments as being "disgraceful" and says they achieve nothing for the industry.
...
"This kind of language makes it extremely hard for the open-source industry to get the appropriate level of consideration in government departments," Waugh continued.
...
Waugh was also disheartened when personal attacks were levelled at Standards Australia's Alistair Tegart over Microsoft's push to have its OOXML format accepted as an ISO standard. "I suspect that as a result, [Teggart] is becoming deeply cynical about open source," Waugh said.

Is this the same "loud minority" that prattles on about the moral value of free code, FOSS licenses as social contracts and the freedom-to-tinker that consumers have shown little enthusiasm about?

posted by Noel Le @ 7:36 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Not at all. Those who have a genuine moral perspective on Software Freedom (like myself) are rarely the people who attack their own audience. :-)

Posted by: Jeff Waugh at May 2, 2008 2:03 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - The "Loud Minority" in the FOSS Movement
- "Free" Culture: It's Not What "We in the West" Might Imagine
- Linux Goes Corporate
- Bruce Everiss on video game piracy
- Reality Settles in on FOSS
- Red Hat Gets Realistic
- FOSS Adoption and Consumer Welfare
- Isn’t It Ironic: TechCrunch Blames the Music Industry for the Dangerous Ideas of Lessig and the Free Culture Movement
- Commercial Open Source Firms Get VC Money
- Differing Estimates of Patent Litigation Costs
Archives by Month
  - April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page