Home Page
04.17.2008 (previous | next)
Red Hat Gets Realistic

Martin LaMonica from CNet writes on Red Hat's latest desktop Linux strategy.

Red Hat likes Linux on the desktop, but it also likes making money.

The company's desktop software unit on Wednesday released an update on its plans, saying it will focus its efforts on specific markets but not face off against Microsoft in the consumer market.

The Linux Desktop team explained:

An explanation: as a public, for-profit company, Red Hat must create products and technologies with an eye on the bottom line, and with desktops, this is much harder to do than with servers. The desktop market suffers from having one dominant vendor, and some people still perceive that today's Linux desktops simply don't provide a practical alternative.

Instead, Red Hat is focusing on desktop software that works with its server products aimed at businesses and developers.

Hmmm. Red Hat diverting commercial efforts away from direct competition with Microsoft? Pretty soon, we will hear the Free Culture-Software Movement crying stifled innovation in the desktop space due to lack of competition (despite the fact that non-competition is due to Red Hat unwilling to go head-to-head with Redmond).

If Red Hat was really a good FOSS community citizen, it would still compete directly with Microsoft on the desktop, ride any loss to its bottom line, and therefore promote the freedom to tinker and the FOSS revolution.

posted by Noel Le @ 11:05 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Red Hat is still very much competing against Microsoft where the money is made -- enterprise desktops. They're not focusing on productising a consumer desktop right now, because it won't provide a substantial return on investment. So, this seems like a *more capably competitive* strategy than diving head-first into a consumer battle in a monopolised market. :-)

Posted by: Jeff Waugh at May 2, 2008 2:09 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - The "Loud Minority" in the FOSS Movement
- "Free" Culture: It's Not What "We in the West" Might Imagine
- Linux Goes Corporate
- Bruce Everiss on video game piracy
- Reality Settles in on FOSS
- Red Hat Gets Realistic
- FOSS Adoption and Consumer Welfare
- Isn’t It Ironic: TechCrunch Blames the Music Industry for the Dangerous Ideas of Lessig and the Free Culture Movement
- Commercial Open Source Firms Get VC Money
- Differing Estimates of Patent Litigation Costs
Archives by Month
  - April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page