Home Page
04. 1.2008 (previous | next)
Differing Estimates of Patent Litigation Costs

IAM Magazine reports on differing estimates of patent litigation costs-

All change at End Software Patents again. The organisation has now downgraded its claims of the total costs involved in software patent litigation in the US from $30.4 billion per annum to $11.2 billion per annum. This follows an email that both myself and Ben Klemens, the executive director of End Software Patents, received from Jim Bessen and Mike Meurer concerning the stats used by the organisation which, it stated, were based on the two men’s research.
...
Interestingly, while Bessen and Meurer (conservatively) estimate that the current total cost of software patent litigation in the US is $8 billion, No Software Patents has the figure at $11.2 billion. I make no comment, but merely point out the disparity.

However, the bigger picture is that on Friday End Software Patents was claiming that $11.4 billion is "wasted" each year “in litigation over software patents”. Now, after a brief flirtation with a sum in excess of $30 billion, the organisation is stating that $11.26 billion of costs are “incurred by software patent lawsuits”. This is something completely different and is probably a lot closer to the reality, although there is still no real explanation of what that extrapolated figure actually means.

Its important to point out that patent litigation costs are estimates (as well as piracy, industry expansion and economic growth projections). I look forward to following the discussion over patent litigation costs among the policy figures noted above.

posted by Noel Le @ 5:33 PM | Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Litigation costs are in the end irrelevant - at the core, patent monopolies are wrong. Even if there was no _economic_ loss from patents, it is immoral for the system to continue to exist, as patent monopolies steal from us all, taking our freedom to use our physical property as we see fit piece by piece.

Posted by: Spumco at April 1, 2008 10:02 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Isn’t It Ironic: TechCrunch Blames the Music Industry for the Dangerous Ideas of Lessig and the Free Culture Movement
- Commercial Open Source Firms Get VC Money
- Differing Estimates of Patent Litigation Costs
- Groklaw and Commercial Influence
- The SFLC and Microsoft
- Bazaars and Cathedrals
- FOSS Developers
- Notions of Free
- Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
Archives by Month
  - April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page