Home Page
03.25.2008 (previous | next)
Notions of Free

PFF's Bret Swanson compares differing notions of free ($0.00 -- The Abundance of Nothing -- Free! vs. Free Culture)-

...it's important to note that [Chris] Anderson's Free! is something quite different from Lawrence Lessig's Free-Culture. One is about new technologies and business models that in the end seek to make money. The other is about the demonization of property and profits. One is about voluntary exchange and creative new ways of doing business. The other is about imposing a radical new utopian and quasi-socialist agenda on our imperfect but highly productive and creative capitalist economy. There may be overlap at the margins of Free! and Free-Culture, but at the core they are very different concepts.
Earlier, I commented along these lines on how contrasting perspectives of free (pertaining to free as in abundance vs free culture-software: the Madness of Crowds) jointly pose arguments against IPRs, yet each disagrees with the basis of the other. One is concerned with economic value transferred through monetary exchange, while the other is not concerned with (and even vilifies) profits. So why do supporters of different conceptions of free get along? This goes to show you that in technology policy, your enemy's enemy is your friend. Yet, the phenomenon does not change the fact that its amusing to watch intellectual property opponents subtlety undermine each other's arguments as they criticize proprietary rights.

posted by Noel Le @ 8:15 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Intellectual monopolies are not property. Until you stop using the propaganda term, your arguments simply cannot be taken seriously at all.

As to differing motivations for supporting intellectual liberty, this is true - but your primitive attempts to divide+conquer are doomed to failure. See, we're already quite aware of the different opinions - the fact there is cross-spectrum support for abolition of intellectual monopoly rights is a good thing. Once we've finally dispatched the infofascist scum, we can go back to arguing amongst ourselves.

Posted by: Spankyou at March 25, 2008 5:15 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Bazaars and Cathedrals
- FOSS Developers
- Notions of Free
- Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
- File-Sharing, LimeWire, Identity Thieves, and 9-Year-Old Girls: Solutions Are Needed
- Patents and R&D Spending
- Public Nonsense about File-Sharing, Identity Theft and Inadvertent Sharing
- File Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 2)
- File-Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 1)
Archives by Month
  - March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page