Home Page
03.25.2008 (previous | next)
Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market

IPcentral's Tom Sydnor reviewed a recent presentation by Professor Lawrence Lessig-

Lessig’s presentation was edifying. In his 1999 book Code, Lessig’s doomsaying ire—while broadly distributed—focused in particular upon commercial providers of online services. Lessig warned that these service providers would turn the Net into a “panopticon,” (a prison of pervasive surveillance), unless we embraced “the idea of placing the design of … the Internet into the hands of government.”
Professor Lessig is not a self-proclaimed free market Libertarian, and being a moderate one myself, I don't find fault in his policy framework that markets rely on regulatory bases. However, my view is that after initial phases of technological development, business model stabilization and societal reach, the market should trump the government in steering the course of innovation. Hence, I take issue with Lessig's view on FOSS.

Lessig's vision of innovation is one that aims to limit intellectual property rights and weaken the commercial sector. His subsequent support for FOSS technologies relies on government subsidies for investment and sustenance. Note a passage from the Future of Ideas where Lessig positions his support for FOSS by downplaying the role of commercialization in developing early Internet technologies and the innovation that ensued from intellectual property rights.

The core of the Internet was this collection of code built outside the proprietary model. For the property obsessed, or those who believe that progress comes only from strong and powerful property rights, pause on this point and read it again: The most important space for innovation in our time was built upon a platform that was free.
Historically, minus commercial industry, the other major players in the advancement of early Internet technologies were the US DoD and its DARPA center, which bank-rolled R&D through academic institutions and federal research labs. Yet private industry was essential to the diffusion of basic federal research into mass market consumer products. (see this history reviewed by Professor Philip Weiser, The Internet, Innovation and IP Policy, 2003- "by calling on commerce to take the leading role in developing the Internet, the government created a gold rush for companies to introduce proprietary technologies to the developing Internet infrastructure.")

Over the past few decades, private industry has vastly over-taken the government in developing and improving on Internet innovations. Lessig's vision would have innovation in Internet technologies return to their very early beginnings under government subsidies, while depriving society of the benefits enabled by commercialization of technologies.

Many FOSS advocates may support Lessig's opposition to intellectual property rights, but if they're free market Libertarians, their bases for FOSS support may be incongruent with his.

posted by Noel Le @ 8:00 AM | Academia, Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

All free-market libertarians should oppose intellectual monopoly rights. See Stephan Kinsella
http://www.stephankinsella.com/ip/

Posted by: Spankyou at March 25, 2008 6:16 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - U.S. Implementation of the Making-Available Right
- The "Loud Minority" in the FOSS Movement
- "Free" Culture: It's Not What "We in the West" Might Imagine
- Linux Goes Corporate
- Bruce Everiss on video game piracy
- Reality Settles in on FOSS
- Red Hat Gets Realistic
- FOSS Adoption and Consumer Welfare
- Isn’t It Ironic: TechCrunch Blames the Music Industry for the Dangerous Ideas of Lessig and the Free Culture Movement
- Commercial Open Source Firms Get VC Money
Archives by Month
  - May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page