Home Page
03.30.2008 (previous | next)
FOSS Developers

The ACT blog reports that a substantial number of FOSS contributors work at proprietary firms.

Somebody, please remind these developers that the FOSS movement relies on their continued tech support-troubleshooting for contributed code despite current professional affiliations, and that in a down-turn economy, if they get laid off, heck, they can still work for free and be part of the revolution.

posted by Noel Le @ 9:01 PM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(4)


Comments

Noel, you (and Microsoft shill group ACT) are the only ones who see anything newsworthy about this information. Users of FOSS don't need to rely on the original developer or any other specific individuals for troubleshooting - they can hire whomever they choose to troubleshoot open code. Users of proprietary software must depend on the continued existence of the original developer to receive technical support. This is common knowledge.

Posted by: John Gordon at April 1, 2008 9:47 AM

Thanks for the clarification John.

I notice you fail to comment on the fact that an estimated half of FOSS developers work at traditional firms:)

Posted by: John at April 1, 2008 12:39 PM

Like I said, that's old news. In fact, it has probably been true for decades. So what?

I notice you fail to comment on the reliability of statements from a group that's well known as a Microsoft shill :)

Posted by: John Gordon at April 1, 2008 5:17 PM

John, ACT did not do the study. A FOSS group did.

Posted by: Noel at April 1, 2008 5:49 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Litigation Costs
- Groklaw and Commercial Influence
- The SFLC and Microsoft
- Bazaars and Cathedrals
- FOSS Developers
- Notions of Free
- Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
- File-Sharing, LimeWire, Identity Thieves, and 9-Year-Old Girls: Solutions Are Needed
- Patents and R&D Spending
Archives by Month
  - April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page