Home Page
01.28.2008 (previous | next)
International Software Patents

A report from the Financial Times on an important ruling in the UK-

Hi-tech companies will be able to patent software programs after a key court decision that may move the UK closer to Europe in its treatment of computer related inventions.

The (UK) High Court yesterday said that the Patent Office was incorrectly applying the law in automatically rejecting claims for computer programs, in a case brought by four small British businesses.
...
If companies can show that their programs make a substantive inventive contribution they will be eligible for protection regardless of the fact that they are distributed on a computer disc, the court said.

This is good for innovation. Per the news coverage on beneficiaries of the decision-
The ruling should help level the playing field in an industry dominated by corporate titans such as Microsoft and Oracle, intellectual property experts said.

"This is a win for hard-working inventors and small businesses, who need patent protection to take advantage of any niche in the market," said Ed Round, a patent attorney at Marks & Clerk.
...
The decision should ease the burden on small technology companies who were going to Europe to seek patent protection, where the hurdle for computer-related patents is generally lower, lawyers said.


posted by Noel Le @ 11:20 AM | International

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

I would replace

"closer to Europe"

by

"closer to the European Patent Office."

The European Patent Office is responsible for the granting side, the national courts are responsible for the post granting side. And those courts are mostly silent when it comes to draw the line in the different 27 member states.

Posted by: zoobab at January 28, 2008 1:41 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Notions of Free
- Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
- File-Sharing, LimeWire, Identity Thieves, and 9-Year-Old Girls: Solutions Are Needed
- Patents and R&D Spending
- Public Nonsense about File-Sharing, Identity Theft and Inadvertent Sharing
- File Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 2)
- File-Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 1)
- Harm to Innovation
- IPRs in BRIC Economies
Archives by Month
  - March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page