Home Page
01.24.2008 (previous | next)
Government Technology Preferences

Dr. KD Raju from Jawaharlal Nehru University-New Delhi released a study on worldwide government technology policies and open source software. Is the Future of Software Development in Open Source? Proprietary vs Open Source Software: A cross Country Analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 12, No.2, (2007).

Surveying open source initiatives across Brazil, China, Europe and India, Raju observes increasing proposals and adoption of open source preference policies. However, Raju cautions that such preferences do not address the enormous impact that technology policy can have on economic development, industrial organization and innovation.

There is no reason to believe that … proposed governmental promotion of OSS increases social welfare. The argument of economic and technology development with the help of OSS is also weak. For example, India achieved the present level of economic progress with the help of proprietary software rather than OSS….

Some governments are taking decisions mostly on political reasons without analyzing technological and economic needs.

The argument of economic development through OSS is not proved by empirical data. It is a common fact that any industry development needs proper investment and development … the sustainable profit making is absent in the OSS set up.
The importance of neutral government technology practices draws back to the beginnings of the modern digital economy. Previously, professors Mowery-Simcoe expertly analyzed how the success of early Internet era federal R&D programs rested on “technology neutral“ policies to promote commercial activity and technological advancement. Neutral government policies that consider the functionality and quality of technology promote economic growth, industrial development and innovation, while preferences that support any particular business-development model are untested.

posted by Noel Le @ 11:35 AM | Academia

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Lessig's FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
- File-Sharing, LimeWire, Identity Thieves, and 9-Year-Old Girls: Solutions Are Needed
- Patents and R&D Spending
- Public Nonsense about File-Sharing, Identity Theft and Inadvertent Sharing
- File Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 2)
- File-Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 1)
- Harm to Innovation
- IPRs in BRIC Economies
- Commercial Benchmarks in Open Source
Archives by Month
  - March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page