Home Page
01.28.2008 (previous | next)
Commercialization is Good for FOSS

Tom Sullivan from InfoWorld reports-

Bill Snyder has some advice for Red Hat. Move over, open source ain't what it used to be. "Perhaps the most startling statistic is this: IBM's open source revenue in 2007 was equal to that of Red Hat, the largest and most influential open source company. Not only did IBM equal Red Hat's open source revenue, but the next largest revenue earners were Sun and Oracle," Snyder explains. "The days of the freewheeling open source movement are numbered. Is this bad news for open source? Not at all. Open source software is more than good enough to stand on its own merits, no matter who owns it. And it's about time that the hardworking visionaries of the open source movement were rewarded with good jobs and high returns on their money and sweat."
When the FOSS movement was young, it leveraged ideology for self-justification and differentiation from traditional firms. However, profit, not ideology, sustains technical development and business models. As I previously wrote on FOSS reliance on traditional firms and profit motive-
...the growth of open source business will continue to rely on integration into traditional commercial value chains of large corporations that appropriate returns from other parts of the chain through proprietary means of return. Open source can be viewed primarily as a means of firms commodotizing industrial markets where they want to reduce the price of inputs, or markets in which they are not competitive. Big money corporate investments in open source makes sense in this context even if the open source revenue stream does not suggest a net gain for the corporate adopter. Consequently, open source has been “unduly romanticized.” It does not change traditional business economics nor signify the displacement of profit motive with altruism on the part of firms like IBM, Intel and Sun.
FOSS has always needed firms like IBM, Sun and Oracle. And, apparently without them, FOSS would have a negligible presence in the technology sector.

posted by Noel Le @ 10:07 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Notions of Free
- Lessig's (Government) FOSS Market
- Zittrain Speaks about Preserving the Internet and Lessig Rants about Eliminating Copyrights and Privacy.
- File-Sharing, LimeWire, Identity Thieves, and 9-Year-Old Girls: Solutions Are Needed
- Patents and R&D Spending
- Public Nonsense about File-Sharing, Identity Theft and Inadvertent Sharing
- File Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 2)
- File-Sharing, CNET and Slashdot: Getting the Story Wrong—Again (Part 1)
- Harm to Innovation
- IPRs in BRIC Economies
Archives by Month
  - March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page