Home Page
12.14.2007 (previous | next)
IP and Marginal Cost

This week, we released "Jargonomics: Intellectual Property Prices and Marginal Cost," Authored by Solveig Singleton. The paper argues that marginal cost should not be a factor in pricing or the basis of IP policy. My release on the paper can be found here.

In the paper, Solveig offers four "lessons" for policymakers regarding marginal cost:

- Prices set above marginal cost are not a sign of undue market power or monopoly due to intellectual property or anything else.
- Prices above marginal costs bring new investment and new competitors into the market in question.
- Setting prices at marginal cost (for example, in the context of compulsory licensing of music or pharmaceuticals) does not amount to setting the "right" price; only a market can do that.
- Insisting on static inefficiency in the short run reduces investment and undermines dynamic efficiency in the long run.

The paper is much too nuanced to properly summarize here - it can be found on the PFF website.

posted by Amy Smorodin @ 10:30 AM | Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice, Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation, Prices, Terms, and Licensing

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(5)


Comments

"only a market can do that."

Only a market without the gross and abhorrent market interference of copyright and patent monopolies can do that!

Go Pirate Party! End Intellectual Slavery Now!

Posted by: Spandau Breakdance at December 16, 2007 10:08 AM

Well, one might add that the entire market for patents, copyrights and trademarks exists because of government intervention, there is nothing 'natural' about any of them.

So, there are two concerns:

1. From a purely economic perspective, what approach optimizes innovation. That is very tricky to measure in an unbiased way, of course, without bringing in the biases of the measurer.

and

2. What level of intervention is consistent with basic liberties and freedoms? The basic liberties and freedoms would include, for example, the Bill of Rights. It is notable that no one from the PFF has ever tried to defend the affronts to freedoms which their policies entail, ignoring all mention of these problems. Well, they won't go away just because you ignore them.

Posted by: enigma_foundry at December 17, 2007 11:12 PM

I don't think either of you actually read the paper.

Posted by: Amy at December 18, 2007 10:30 AM

Actually, yes I did and there is nothing addressing these two issues there, although to be fair, it is concentrated on a certain economic analysis, but still the comment number one was not addressed, which is: what metric do you use to measure innovation?

And re: the second point, there is no one at PFF who is capable to understanding this point because of the informational exclusions that your world view includes, you are in fact incapable of recognizing this issue.

Posted by: enigma_foundry at December 20, 2007 12:22 AM

Enigma Foundry writes:

"Well, one might add that the entire market for patents, copyrights and trademarks exists because of government intervention, there is nothing 'natural' about any of them."

If that's what you believe, then to be consistent, you should say the same about the market for all forms of property.

Government intervention, in the form of laws (trespassing, theft, etc.), courts to enforce the laws, and police power to back up the courts, is what creates a viable market for all other forms of property. If not for these forms of government intervention, how are you going to successfully enjoy, buy and sell real property, physical property, or any other property interests (bonds, securities, contract rights)?

Posted by: alec french at December 28, 2007 11:41 AM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - Harm to Innovation
- IPRs in BRIC Economies
- Commercial Benchmarks in Open Source
- The Reality of FOSS
- Defining Developments in the FOSS Movement
- NDN Globalization Initiative Report Out
- Technophrenia, Piracy, and Filtering
- International Software Patents
- Sun Microsystems Gobbles up MySQL
- Commercialization is Good for FOSS
Archives by Month
  - February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page