Home Page
10.16.2007 (previous | next)
OSI Approves Microsoft Licenses

VNUNet reports that OSI has approved several Microsoft submitted licenses.

The OSI approves licences by validating compliance to ten rules set in the Open Source Definition. The decision was reached with an "overwhelming majority " of the votes, but not unanimously, OSI president Michael Tiemann said in a posting on the group's website.
Microsoft appears pleased with this development. Although the firm has traded barbs with the FOSS community in the past, it appears to compete with specific FOSS products, rather than the FOSS movement more generally. To Microsoft, having its licenses OSI approved may simply mean that it can have closer interactions with the FOSS community, and adopt wider business models than its tradtional strategies.
Microsoft welcomed the decision. " This is a significant milestone in the progression of Microsoft's open source strategy and the company's ongoing commitment to participation in the open source community to effectively meet the evolving needs of developers," the company said in an emailed statement.
Of course, not everyone is celebrating. It appears Google wants to keep Microsoft out of the FOSS tent.
Google's open source programme manager Chris DiBona had argued that Microsoft should be required to meet requirements beyond the ten listed in the Open Source Definition to gain approval for its licences. DiBona's plea however was turned down. In his posting, Tiemann said that OSI and Microsoft had a constructive dialog, "in spite of recent negative interactions between Microsoft and the open source community."
Microsoft wins by having means for closer collaboration with the FOSS community, the FOSS movement wins by gaining recognition from one of the largest technology firms in the world. Google does not win, because it has not made life more difficult for Microsoft.

posted by Noel Le @ 3:55 PM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

FOSS? This is definitely an area where you shouldn't be mixing up the "Free Software" and "Open Source" movements with such gay abandon.

"FOSS movement wins by gaining recognition from one of the largest technology firms in the world. "

Hah. Microsoft's modus operandi has been documented as "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish

We'll see if they succeed here. But the Free Software movement's GPL that is so hated by Microsoft and other infofascists certainly seems smarter every year.

Posted by: Moocow at October 16, 2007 9:38 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page