Home Page
08. 8.2007 (previous | next)
New Merges Article

Professor Robert Merges has published a new article available at SSRN (see my review of the working paper here)- Software and Patent Scope: A Report from the Middle Innings, Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 1627, 2007.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, it was commonly said that patents would severely damage the software industry. I review some of these early predictions, and hold them up to the light of actual experience... judged by overall industry revenues... product innovation, or ...vibrancy of new firm entry - the industry today appears quite robust. I conclude that the early predictions were wrong. This helps explain why we are experiencing what might be called the normalization of software patents.

Now, the frontier legal issues pertaining to software no longer center on whether it should be patentable in the first place. ..the interesting questions now concern the details and contours of patent protection for software inventions...

The overall theme of the Article is normalization: the legal system is integrating software into the fabric of patent law, and software firms are integrating patents into the competitive fabric of the industry. Proper application of enablement principles will help insure reasonable scope for software patents and thus assist this process of normalization.

Many criticisms of software patents are rather brash, and do not acknowledge today's level of innovation nor the fact that the competitive industry landscape benefits small-specialized firms. Software patents have stirred innovation, economic growth and technical advances. Software patents are beneficial, the free culture and free software movements on the other hand... they should join the rest of us.

posted by Noel Le @ 9:00 PM | Academia, Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(2)


Comments

Yes. The doom and gloom scenarios that anti-patent folks paint have little to no basis in reality. Much like the rhetoric around the DMCA...

Posted by: Mark Blafkin at August 9, 2007 1:04 PM

Well, you have said nothing that shows that software patents have not stifled innovation and harmed the software industry--to do that you have to do more than show that innovation still exists--you have to show me that the software industry is now doing better than it would be doing under a no software patent environment.

Please show me something that relates to this concern.

Posted by: e at August 12, 2007 5:46 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page