Home Page
08.20.2007 (previous | next)
FOSS FUD

For years, Linus Torvalds has been one of the most reasonable and stable figures from the FOSS community. Thus, I was surprised to see Torvalds recite the usual FOSS battle cry of labeling anything and everything that disrupts the fanatical prattling of FOSS supporters as FUD. As James DeLong previously noted, cries of FUD from the FOSS community is itself a form of FUD. The more FOSS fails to live up to the revolutionary hoopla of its supporters, the more blame it needs to throw around.

[on recent Microsoft patent claims against FOSS] "I personally think it's mainly another shot in the FUD war," Torvalds said in the interview with ComputerWorld. "Microsoft has a really hard time competing on technical merit, and they traditionally have instead tried to compete on price. But that obviously doesn't work either, not against open source. So they'll continue to bundle packages and live off the inertia of the marketplace, but they want to feed that inertia with FUD."
Torvalds gives Microsoft a lot of credit. Microsoft is only one company, while FOSS' corporate supporters (IBM, Cisco, Google, and counting) include many of the biggest players in the industry. Would it make Torvalds happier if Microsoft started shipping Linux on Windows CDs? Should scientists at Microsoft Research donate time to Linux development? Is there anything else Microsoft can do for FOSS?

FOSS development and business models have been around for a long time, and its supporters have been playing the blame game the whole time.

posted by Noel Le @ 10:26 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(2)


Comments

Accusing those who accuse Microsoft of FUD of employing FUD themselves is itself a form of FUD.

Seriously though, where's your evidence that Torvalds's statements are less correct or more misleading than Microsoft's?

Posted by: John Gordon at August 20, 2007 12:01 PM

Noel, you folks have bigger problems than that,
Linus seems to be warming to GPL 3.0:

Q: How do you see the relationship of Linux and Solaris evolving in the future? How will it benefit the users?

Linus: I don't actually see a whole lot of overlap, except that I think Solaris will start using more of the Linux user space tools (which I obviously don't personally have a lot to do with -- I really only do the kernel). The Linux desktop is just so much better than what traditional Solaris has, and I expect Solaris to move more and more towards a more Linux-like model there.

On the pure kernel side, the licensing differences mean that there's not much cooperation, but it will be very interesting to see if that will change. Sun has been making noises about licensing Solaris under the GPL (either v2 or v3), and if the licence differences go away, that could result in some interesting technology. But I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude to that....if Solaris really is to be released under the GPLv3, maybe the advantage of avoiding unnecessary non-compatible licence issues could be enough of an advantage that it might be worth trying to re-license the Linux kernel under the GPLv3 too.

Posted by: enigma_foundry at August 20, 2007 11:27 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page