Home Page
06.20.2007 (previous | next)
What Does Not Kill a Patent Makes it Stronger

The Peer-to-Patent Project, an effort by the USPTO, academic institutions and commercial industry players, aims to connect the technological community with the patenting process. With the project, the public can submit prior art and commentary on pending patent applications, and help shape future innovation.

While it would appear that all parties concerned with innovation would benefit from and cheer on the Peer-to-Patent Project, that’s not the case. Linux World has an interesting note from a fellow who realized that a peer-review examination process that does not kill a patent makes it stronger.

Instead of facing bandits armed with patents likely to be bad, we'll be facing bandits (patent holders) who are confident in their weapons (patents). If you think the problem of mostly-bad software patents is bad today, try peer-reviewed patents that are more likely to go off (be enforced in court).
...
I'm not saying that we shouldn't try to find prior art, but why share information with the trolls? Sun Tzu said, "He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious." I say "He who tells someone else when he can fight and when he cannot will be...um...losetorious."

If you have Prior Art, print it out and put it in your safe deposit box. Make sure that the source is verifiable, but don't tell anyone what the source is.
In some ways, the Peer-to-Patent Project is not entirely different from “patent busting” efforts, such as those by EFF and various amateur patent agents in the FOSS community. There is scrutiny of patent claims, comparison of those claims to existing knowledge and prior art, and a purported desire to improve the quality of technological patents. However, if the FOSS movement does not like the Peer-to-Patent Project, but supports the patent busting efforts of relatively anti-patent FOSS affiliated parties, one must question whether those parties really want to improve the patent system or simply take it apart.

posted by Noel Le @ 5:25 PM | Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(3)


Comments

Noel, the patent system would be improved by its destruction. Patent monopolies are a gross affront to human dignity and liberty.


Posted by: Sparko at June 20, 2007 7:55 PM

Would you care to explain how:-)

Posted by: Noel at June 20, 2007 8:17 PM

I think that file it in the drawer business is a bad idea. What ever happened to disclosure journals?

Also, if we ever unify around first-to-file, withholding prior art will be a very bad idea.

Posted by: orcmid at June 21, 2007 6:51 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page