Home Page
06. 5.2007 (previous | next)
OECD on International Trade in Counterfeit/Pirated Goods

The OECD has released preliminary findings on international trade in counterfeit and pirated goods, estimating that the amount was up to $200 billion in 2005. The total does not include counterfeit and pirated goods that 1) were produced and consumed locally, 2) were distributed over the Internet (hence, illicit P2P networks were left out of calculation). The OECD research states that if these latter two items were in their methodology, "the total magnitude of counterfeiting and piracy worldwide could well be several hundred billion dollars more."

Among key insights by the OECD:

Counterfeiting-piracy are illicit businesses where criminal networks thrive.

More effective enforcement is critical ...as is the need to build public support to combat the counterfeiting and piracy.

[International trade in counterfeit/pirated goods] is larger than the national GDPs of about 150 economies.

The OECD also presents the effects of counterfeiting/piracy, including negative impact on innovation and the ability for nations to attract foreign direct investment.

Innovation has long been recognised as a main driver of economic growth, through the development and exploitation of ideas for new products and processes. Innovators protect these ideas through patents, copyrights... Without adequate protection of IPRs, the incentive to develop new ideas and products would be reduced... weakening the innovation process.

The situation with respect to IPRs is one of many factors considered by firms who are investing abroad... The relationship was tested in an econometric analysis carried out by the OECD. It found that FDI from Germany, Japan and the US was relatively higher in economies with lower rates of counterfeiting and piracy.

The OECD does a good job of showing how criminal activity does not benefit, or even provide for Free Culture.

On the other hand, perhaps Free Culture proponents, who espouse the virtues of perfectly free markets and weak copyright policies, should move to a non-TRIPS signatory country, try to start up a business, and write-back about their freedom from the DMCA. Within a week, they'd be calling IPcentral to save them...

posted by Noel Le @ 8:02 PM | Enforcement & Remedies, Free Culture Movement, International

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

[Noel, why not move to an internetwork that uses no Free technology to post your drivel? Good luck with that...]

Actually, counterfeiting and fake/imitation goods are a very different issue to copyright and patent law. (Note how pirate parties don't tend to argue against trademark law, only copyright and patent!
A distinction the very term "IP" itself is designed to blur in an effort at debate-framing)

"Passing off" is a matter of fraud. Even in the absence of the current main effects of copyright and patent law (restrictions on redistribution and reimplementation), it's rather easy to imagine that fraudulently claiming to be the author of a book or designer of a device could be illegal, even if you are allowed copy the book or implement a similar device (and in fact, such is a legal system that I, at least, might well support).


Posted by: Larko at June 5, 2007 9:30 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page