Home Page
06.16.2007 (previous | next)
Microsoft and Interoperability

Martin LaMonica from Cnet reports on an interview with Tom Robertson and Jean Paoli, two leaders of Microsoft’s interoperability efforts.

Microsoft views its string of deals with Linux vendors--the latest being Linspire, announced this week--as part of a broader companywide push to improve interoperability.

Technology and legal pacts with open-source companies serve dual purposes, they said in an interview Thursday with CNET News.com.

First, such pacts establish a way for Microsoft to make its products work better with those from other vendors. They also create a legal structure for Microsoft--a strong proponent of patents and intellectual property protections--to operate in a world where open source is commonplace.

"It's an issue of coexistence in the marketplace," said Robertson. "We have to find a way to address intellectual property issues and interoperability issues."

Intellectual property pacts signal a convergence between disparate parts of the technology community. Consumers will benefit from different development models and innovative schemes coming together. Contrasts Microsoft’s approach with that of the Linux Foundation.

[referring to FOSS collaborations w/ Microsoft and IP pacts] "Guys: Be seekers of truth, not finders of contradiction," Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Linux Foundation... only half-jokingly told the 150 attendees of what is billed their "Collaboration Summit."
What?! Even though Zemlin was "half joking," his comments reflect a shortcoming of the FOSS movement. In the technology sector, there is no fine line between competitors and partners, nor do consumers care about differing ideologies of FOSS and proprietary firms. Whats important is innovation, and more innovation will result from divergent groups collaborating on what neither can alone achieve. But based on Zemlin's inability to consider this seriously, the FOSS movement's market share and industry presence in the coming years may itself be a half-joke.

posted by Noel Le @ 11:28 AM | Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page