Home Page
05. 7.2007 (previous | next)
IBM, Open Source, & Progammers

Robert Cringely's recent column Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? says that IBM plans drastic downsizing in the U.S., expecially in the global services division, and that it plans to axe unprofitable customers as well as employees.

I am curious as to what this means for support for the FOSS movement. IBM has been the major financial force in moving FOSS from a hackers' playground to a serious commercial factor. If the reorganization involves a slackening of this support, then the effect could be tectonic, because others -- providers, programmers, and users -- who have been riding on IBM would have to begin paying their full share.

On the other hand, IBM could be figuring that off-shore programmers can handle the support for FOSS programs that were originally created by programmers in the U.S., so it can now dispense with the U.S. programmers. See ya, guys -- and thanks, suckers.

posted by James DeLong @ 9:26 AM | Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation, Software

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(3)


Comments

And thanks to patent monopolies, the laid off staff can't use their skills, experience and knowledge to compete with their former employers. Thanks, assinine corporatist US patent system!

Real free markets mean no patents.

Posted by: Spumco at May 7, 2007 1:37 PM

You are right Spumco, real free markets mean no patents, but they also mean to formal capital system, no framework with which parties can make and enforce contracts, and most likely, little innovation.

Its interesting you say that individual innovators cannot compete with firms like IBM because of patents, but you provide little as to what those innovators have to leverage in bargaining and collaborating with larger and more powerful entities. Hmmm, patents come to mind... you should get one some time.

Posted by: Noel at May 7, 2007 6:44 PM

"no framework with which parties can make and enforce contracts"

Except for... contract law! Are you that moronic?

"most likely, little innovation." ?

Except that reality, Noel, has already disproven that - the pre-patenting history of computing itself, the technological progress in WWII when patents could be bypassed, etc.

There may be less corporate-controlled innovation, but that's a good thing in my book. Reducing the costs of innovation to zero means that anyone can innovate, without central control or authority, terrifying the poor little corpies, but much better for most of us.

Posted by: Spumco at May 9, 2007 7:04 AM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page