Home Page
05.14.2007 (previous | next)
Compulsory License for Broadcast to be Reexamined

The Copyright Office is studying the compulsory licensing system for the cable and satellite television. The results of the examination are due June 30th, 2008. The compulsory licenses are regulated by Section 111 of the Copyright act (permits cable to retransmit broadcast programming to subscribers), Section 119 and 122 (allows satellite carriers to retransmit iers of distant television signals and let satellite carriers to retransmit distant and local television signals, respectively).

The Copyright Office will examine: 1) royalty fees paid; 2) terms and conditions of the licenses, and competitive impact; 3) necessity of the licenses 4) analysis of savings to subscribers 5) application of the licenses to further retransmissions. Royalties paid under the rates set by the copyright offices now amount to about $125 million annually for cable, $50 million for satellite.

Compulsory licensing sets up a vicious cycle. Once started, it becomes incredibly difficult to end and return to a market-based licensing system based on negotiations. Broadcasters are often barred by regulation from seeking other outlets, while cable has in part become complacent about its right to retransmit broadcast programming. No progress has been made to set right the confusion about default rights to retransmit that gave rise to the original problem, so it remains to lie in wait for other technologies. Ugh.

posted by Solveig Singleton @ 8:42 AM | Media: Video, Music..., Prices, Terms, and Licensing, Spectrum & Wireless

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page