Home Page
04.16.2007 (previous | next)
Can Somebody Make a Decision on GPL3?

OpenLogic, Inc., a FOSS solutions firm, recently conducted a survey on GPL3. Obviously, the group has interests in the commercial and practical aspects of updating the GPL. So why are the survey results so confusing?

71% of respondents who currently use the GPL v2 said they would support moving projects they work with to the GPLv3 when the final draft comes out.
With such faith (signing on with a license that’s not even completed yet), a surprisingly small percentage of survey respondents indicated positive outlooks when asked other questions on GPL3:
o 50% of the respondents said that they believe GPLv3 is good for [FOSS]
o 29.5% are not sure
o 15.9% said they do not believe GPL v3 is good for open source.
What?!

CNet provides some clarification on the lack of consensus on GPL3- there is none.

Of the 45 people who responded (to the OpenLogic survey), 50% said they believed GPL 3 is good for the open-source programming movement. That's not a majority by any stretch of the imagination, but it's three times the 16% who said they believed GPL 3 wasn't good for open source. And 30% said they weren't sure.
Perhaps some meaning will arise on Thursday, May 17 when Professor Eben Moglen gives a webinar on GPL3. I can't wait...

posted by Noel Le @ 3:32 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page