Home Page
03.23.2007 (previous | next)
ITIF Forum on the Peer to Patent Project and Patent Reform

WHAT: ITIF Policy Forum on the Peer to Patent Project and Patent Reform

WHO:
Beth Noveck, Director, New York Law School Institute for Information Law and Policy
Marc Williams, Governmental Programs Executive, Intellectual Property, IBM
Kaz Kazenske, Senior Director, IP&L-Patent Group, Microsoft
Rob Atkinson, President of ITIF

WHERE: Senate Dirksen Office Building, Hearing Room 419

WHEN: Monday, March 26, 2007 -- 12:00 NOON to 1:30 PM

RSVP to mail@innovationpolicy.org

BLURB:

Reform of the U.S. patent system is crucial and policymakers are considering an array of complicated legislative proposals. Yet a new public-private project to be launched this spring by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and several high-tech companies may provide a useful approach that legislation may build on to help solve the problem of poor quality patents, lack of prior art, and lack of USPTO training in complex technologies.

The Peer to Patent (Community Patent Review) Project was originally conceived by Professor Beth Noveck, Director of the New York Law School’s Institute for Information Law and Policy. The project has the support of several companies specializing in IT, including Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Oracle, Computer Associates, General Electric, Red Hat, Omidyar Network, Intel, and Out of the Box Computing.

The project creates a peer review system for patents that exploits network technology to enable innovation experts to inform the patent examination procedure. The system will support a network of experts to advise the Patent Office on prior art as well as to assist with patentability determinations. The project applies the “wisdom of the crowd” – or, more accurately the wisdom of the experts – to complex social and scientific problems to make it easier to protect the inventor’s investment while safeguarding the marketplace of ideas.

posted by James DeLong @ 1:53 PM | Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page