Home Page
03.29.2007 (previous | next)
ACT on GPLv3

[T]his third version of the General Public License can be simply written “GPL v.” – where “v” stands not for “version” but for “vendetta.”

There’s little doubt that this GPL 3 draft is a vendetta against the patent non-assertion agreement we saw in the Microsoft and Novell deal. But it is also aimed at the use of technological protection measures like digital rights management. Overall, these new additions will hurt the open source software community by elevating code over the desires of the marketplace.
Subsequent headings:
Turning the Four Freedoms into the Ten Commandments

GPL 3 Elevates Code over Consumers and Developers

There’s No Reason to “Upgrade” to GPL 3

A Bonfire of the Vanities?

posted by James DeLong @ 8:24 AM | Software

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(2)


Comments

Well, not really:

Developers can choose their license. No one's forcing them into GPL v3 over GPL v2 or BSD (unless they want to incorporate code written by developers who do want to use GPL v3, but then those developers should have the right to choose their license too, suerly?)

You can use GPL code for DRM, you jsut can't use DRM to circumvent the GPL license. Again, it seems reasonable that developers should have their copyright respected and their choses license adhered to.

Posted by: Simon at March 29, 2007 11:25 AM

ACT is openly and notoriously a Microsoft creation, so hardly a source of objective analysis. Don't embarrass yourselves by denying this.

Posted by: John Gordon at March 29, 2007 5:46 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page