IPcentral Weblog: Relevant to KSR obviousness

02.13.2007

(previous | next)

Relevant to KSR obviousness

Brits report on UK patent law discusses the "inventive step" doctrine, which serves the same function as the "obviousness" inquiry in the US. It may be more stringent. Hat tip Bill Heinze.

posted by Solveig Singleton @ 9:14 AM | Patents, Supreme Court

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)

IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts

- IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes

Archives by Month

- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007

- (see all)

Archives by Subject

- Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities

Links

Site Feed

- Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0

We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.