Home Page
02.26.2007 (previous | next)
No. 10 Downing Street Defends DRM

About 1,400 UK activists told the UK government they only want one option in the digital music market -- a flat fee with full rights over the content. As such, they wanted DRM banned. The Office of the Prime Minister has rejected that petition. No. 10 Downing Street stated that content distributors have every right to protect their works from piracy with DRM if they so choose, but also noted DRM benefits consumers: "DRM does not only act as a policeman through technical protection measures, it also enables content companies to offer the consumer unprecedented choice in terms of how they consume content, and the corresponding price they wish to pay." Well said.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 9:18 AM | DRM & Watermarks, etc.

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Hmmmm...

as I have said here and elsewhere, many many times, that if IP Central were to get one half of the IP maximalization they are asking for, the backlash which would result would erase so many existing IP protections, there wouldn't be anything to write about here anymore.

So:

1. Be careful you might get what you ask for, andd be very sorry soon afterwards.

2. The reaction against IP maximalization has already been growing and is much stronger in Brazil and Euope. This story is just anothe rdata point. Today 1,400 protestors, tomorrow, 14,000.

Posted by: enigma_foundry at February 28, 2007 11:44 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page