Home Page
12.20.2006 (previous | next)
Quiz for Net Neutrality Proponents

Akamai and Sony have struck a deal whereby Akamai will distribute Sony's PLAYSTATION (R) Network. The news story, translated from Japanese, says:

Through the use of Akamai's distributed delivery services, unlike alternative offerings that rely on centralized data-center servers located domestically, it becomes possible to achieve greater reliability and scale by delivering added value to ubiquitous terminals, such as cell phones. Akamai's dynamic content delivery capabilities also ensure high performance and reliability of dynamically-rendered, personalized Web content.
My translation of the translation is that Sony is going to get premium service and will, undoubtedly, pay a premium price.

All right, you proponents of net neutrality, fill in the blank: "This is bad because _______________."

posted by James DeLong @ 8:00 AM | Telecom

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(3)


Comments

This is bad because the Telcos aren't getting their fingers on this slice of the pie?

Posted by: G-money at December 20, 2006 10:43 AM

Come on Jim, this has been covered a thousand times before.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060530/1055221.shtml

Akamai and others like that are an entirely different sort of deal. They're still about end-to-end connectivity. It's about the producer of the content or service speeding up delivery for everyone -- not just those who are customers of a specific ISP. It doesn't set up different tiers for different people, but speeds up the connectivity for everyone.

Do you really not know that or are you just pretending to be unable to understand the difference? Either way, it again raises questions about how you view things. Either you don't do your homework, or you pretend not to understand a very basic difference. Neither is particularly flattering.

Posted by: Mike Masnick at December 21, 2006 9:08 PM

Masnick, tell us exactly how your distinction is disregarded by JDelong. I think you're reading the analogy to net neutrality too closely.

Sheeesh. All of these kids, they try to introduce a distinction just to argue for the sake of arguing, and then go off on a rant where that distinction is not even significant.

Posted by: Noel Le at December 23, 2006 3:26 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page