Home Page
12.22.2006 (previous | next)
Errors, Omissions and Short Book Reviews

Getting ready for the holidays, I thought I’d search around for some light reading. I was pleasanty surprised to learn that copyright champion, Professor Paul Goldstein at Stanford, has released a fiction novel: Errors and Omissions.

Going to Dennis Crouch’s website, I find that Goldstein’s colleague, Professor Mark Lemley has written a review of Errors and Omissions.

What is this?! A 100 word book review that tells us almost nothing?!

A legal thriller about copyright law? And not even about trial, but about rights clearance in order to get errors and omissions insurance? Not likely. But my colleague Paul Goldstein's new novel, "Errors and Omissions," grabs your attention from the first page and never lets it go. He manages to work murder, chases, love, McCarthyism, the Hollywood blacklist, and a trip to Europe into the otherwise mundane life of a down-on-his-luck copyright lawyer. Along the way, he keeps us entertained with a quick and enjoyable read.

I am reliably informed that Paul's next novel will be a thriller about patent law, featuring a Markman hearing. Talk about raising the bar . .

Years ago, when I began my career as a legal assistant inside a corporate legal department, I was asked to print out some IP law reviews for policy folks to look over. One of those articles was by Lemley. I thought to myself: “hmm, looks interesting." Thereafter I’ve read almost all the writings by this enormously talented scholar. Lemley has definitely shaped my understanding of technology policy.

But of all the lengthy law reviews from Lemley I've charged through, why does he only write a 100 word review of Goldstein’s book?!

Strangely, looking at Lemley’s comments on Errors and Omissions, I find myself intrigued due to Lemley's vagueness. I'm more inclined to get the book. It appears mysterious and alluring now that I'm aware of it, yet know little about it.

If this is a ploy by the Stanford professors to sell Errors and Omissions, then fine. However, I’m not reading any more of Lemley’s 100 page law reviews now that I know his talent with brevity…

posted by Noel Le @ 3:05 PM | Academia

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page