Home Page
11. 6.2006 (previous | next)
Yes, Virginia, There is a Rights Market

The market's love affair with Google notwithstanding, Google is a publicly traded company and its actions are answerable to shareholders. We're reminded of that by Chris Castle, who along with Mark Cuban has been skeptical of the Google-YouTube pairing from Day One. In his latest post, Chris notes the media is now doing the due diligence on the merger that one would expect Google management to have performed before the acquisition. He also notes the problems go far beyond what we're hearing:

However, the most interesting thing about the GooTube is not the copyright issues--Google would like to keep everyone focused on that, and their belief that somehow the DMCA "safe harbor" protects massive infringers. How about right of publicity? Trademark infringement? Palming off or reverse palming off? No safe harbors on those, kiddies. No notice and takedown--that's just for copyright, and copyright is just one of the claims. And it's a bit late in the day to try to clean your hands.

I'm particularly pleased, however, that Chris points out that, yes, obtaining rights isn't always easy.

We are starting to hear the same old whine from the Slacker 2.0 crowd: Waaaah, it's too hard, Mommy! There're record companies and artists and publishers and writers and unions and producers and samples and they all want money, Mommy!! Mommy, my head hurts!

My favorite newspaper, the Wall Street Journal, had a story last week expressing such sympathy for YouTube in tracking down rights. Yes, I thought, it's a terrible thing, these greedy people who want to be compensated for use of their work, or at a minimum simply want to be asked first. A YouTube official told the Journal that government might be the solution. Yes, when the market requires actual work, better to get the government do the work for you. Obviously the folks at YouTube need to read my paper on the vibrant rights market. God forbid if we end up with a statutory license for online video sites.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 12:50 PM | Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation, Media: Video, Music...

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page