Home Page
11.13.2006 (previous | next)
Why FOSS Wants to be "Non-commercial"

Samba comments disapprovingly on the Microsoft-Novell patent agreement:

(The patent agreement is) divisive ... It deals with users and creators of free software differently depending on their "commercial" versus "non-commercial" status, and ... whether they obtained their free software directly from Novell or from someone else.

The goals of the Free Software community and the GNU GPL allow for no such distinctions.

Lets see here. Microsoft and Novell have buddied up in what they view as a mutually beneficial pact that will protect many FOSS users from the very issue FOSS entities tirelessly cite as detrimental to the industry- software patents. So, besides being left out of the big tent, why is Samba unhappy?

Samba may not like Microsoft and Novell working together for a very subtle reason. For years, FOSS proponents have argued policy views on the precept that FOSS development is either "non-commercial" or has commercial aspects that cannot be looked at separately from non-commercial considerations. The intended effect on policy discourse of FOSS proponents' argument is to place FOSS outside the reach of standard economic and legal scrutiny.

There is strategic value in FOSS clothed as "non-commercial." FOSS proponents can then oppose regulations that create common business and legal compliance costs, such as copyright licensing or prior art documentation, because these laws may affect their "non-commercial" activities. Further consequences of FOSS' self-ordained "non-commercial" identity is that FOSS becomes non-amenable to:

1) market indicators (FOSS companies can tout various virtues rather than profitability or viability),
2) policy concerns for long term innovation (FOSS has no conception of basic R&D),
3) the consumer market (FOSS' business models rely on their products needing constant support).
By showing itself as a profit motivated entity that can work with a major IP firm for the benefit of its business and customers, Novell puts pressure on FOSS entities like Samba to pursue similar practical moves many FOSS supporters view as symbolic admission that FOSS can be seen as a commercial phenomenon.

posted by Noel Le @ 11:56 AM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

To a reader whose comment I inadvertantly deleted while clearing out spam- no, I'm not saying FOSS is inherently anti-profit. Who would argue that Red Hat is not profit oriented. Not me...

I'm saying that FOSS' often tries to avoid business and legal scrutiny by putting at the forefront of policy discourse its non-commercial aspects.

Posted by: Noel Le at November 18, 2006 7:26 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page