Home Page
11.10.2006 (previous | next)
Suspicions Confirmed!

Today's WSJ (subscription required) has an article: "Animals Seem to Have An Inherent Sense Of Fairness and Justice." It cites experimental examples of monkeys acting according to a code of fairness and reciprocity. For example:

[A tray with food on it] was counterweighted so that both monkeys had to pull a bar to haul in lunch, moving the tray snugly against the cage in such a way that Sammy could reach one cup and Bias the other.

But Sammy was in such a hurry to chow down that after grabbing the apple in her cup, she let go of the tray before Bias could dig into her own. The tray snapped out of reach, causing Bias to scream bloody murder. After half a minute, Sammy understood. She reached out for the tray and helped Bias reel it in.
. . .
[Then the researchers] counterweighted tray so that it required only one monkey to reel it in. In this case, the monkey almost never shares its apple with the monkey who hasn't helped. No work, no pay is fair.

When pulling the tray requires two monkeys' efforts, but only one cup is filled, the lucky monkey often shares its spoils. "Winners were, in effect, compensating their partners for received assistance," Prof. de Waal writes. It was the fair thing to do.
. . . .
It isn't hard to see the survival value of being able to detect inequity. Cooperation requires a grasp of fairness. You need to be able to detect (and punish) freeloaders to keep a cooperative society running. "Fairness counts," she says. "Humans and other animals are able to detect unfairness because doing so is beneficial."

I knew it! The P2P movement represents a step backwards in evolution -- an state less advanced than the capuchin monkey!

posted by James DeLong @ 12:35 PM | Internet: P2P, Search Engines...

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(4)


Comments

Listening to some (not all) FOSS, P2P, and "consumer freedom" campaigns who want to repeal the DMCA, eliminate software patents, take down the "Hollywood Studios," consider the US venture capital system a waste of consumer welfare, and dislike anything doing with successful IP firms, it sounds like evolutionary atavism has been systematically clothed in policy language.

Posted by: Noel Le at November 10, 2006 4:20 PM

Isn't this kind of ad hominem (i.e., P2P users are less evolved than monkeys) the kind of thing that reduces dialog and causes enmity, rather than spirited discussion and debate?

Posted by: Commons Music at November 11, 2006 3:38 AM

The post refers to those who illegally exchange copyrighted files. Call this outlawed, pirating, riffraff or less evolved than monkeys, the analytical focus is still on the nature of the activities, and how P2Ps justify them.

Posted by: Noel Le at November 11, 2006 1:36 PM

I still maintain it's not helpful. After all, teenage and college-age users are by far the largest base for P2P. If the position of the RIAA (besides lawsuits) is education on copyright, which should be yours too, then these histrionics do little to reach them, and only further justify their positions to themselves. Granted, few people outside of copyright interest read this blog, but its same song, different verse. Neither side likes to be demonized, so why participate in it?

Posted by: Commons Music at November 14, 2006 1:50 AM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page