Home Page
08.10.2006 (previous | next)
Fragmented DRM Systems and Innovation

What is the current consumer view on DRM? Perhaps they focus on the lack of interoperability between iTunes songs and most non-Apple music players, or the inability to play various music services on the iPod. While some online music services and music players are free of DRM, these issues highlight incompatibility, or fragmentation, between DRM systems. This fragmentation does not simply result from preferences of technology or content companies, but rather the business dynamics they work under.

Although standardization of DRM systems would result in lower prices for digital goods, this has not occurred as some scholars like Suzanne Scotchmer of Berkeley predict. In Fragmentation versus Standardization in the Market for Digital Rights Management Solutions (July 2006), several rearchers at Law and Economics Consulting Group ask why, and find that fragmentation of DRM solutions arises from market competition and the different uses of DRM that firms leverage. 10. Acknowledging that fragmented DRM schemes not only prevent price reducation but also limit the value of products for consumers, the researchers point out the ease enabled by low switching costs between different proprietary brands. 17. They note that users often buy several different DRM solutions at once, as content owners often release their content in many different formats. 18.

However, the benefit of fragmented DRM systems arises in competition to create products with greater functionality and value, thus bringing more innovation to market in the long term. 20. Competitors find ways of leveraging existing content sources and perhipherals, such as RealNetwork’s reversing engineering of Apple’s DRM around iTunes. 20. The DMCA may bring restrictions, yet the market has its own correcting balance through increasing the flexibility with which consumers can enjoy content. 23. Finally, as no DRM systems have become industry standard "vendors compete for more content owners by developing secure DRM solutions, and for customers by offering a wider selection of content and more flexibility with the purchased product." 20.

… when the iTunes store first opened in April 2003 songs purchased were only able to be played on 3 computers… RealNetworks, MusicMatch and Wal-mart all entered the digital download market, and Wal-mart offered downloads for a mere $0.88 that we able to be played on up to 10 computers. It is very likely that Apple’s choice to lower restrictions on its DRM protected content was a direct result of increased competition in the digital download market… although there could be a wide breadth of restrictions limiting customer’s right of fair use, the competition among online stores has increased users’ flexibility with protected content. 23.

posted by Noel Le @ 4:12 PM | DRM & Watermarks, etc., Prices, Terms, and Licensing, Standards

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

There are a lot of technical problems with universal DRM. The only easy way to make it universal and work is to build it into the OS' I/O system. I don't think even a plugin would be good enough there because of the issues involved with being able to circumvent a system where DRM is not a basic assumption of the design.

What's good is that this stuff is happening in user-space, not in the operating system which means that DRM won't, for now at least, turn the average PC into a glorified toaster.

Posted by: MikeT at August 11, 2006 8:31 AM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page