Home Page
08. 4.2006 (previous | next)
Bad Open Source Citizens? I'll Throw a Red Flag on That One

VNUNet reports that Yahoo! and Google have been accused of being “bad open source citizens" since they do not open up source code for all internally developed apps. The allegation comes from the VP for business development at Alfrasco, an open source software company.

It is disappointing that they are such heavy users of open source and have architected themselves into a corner that makes giving back impossible or problematic.

I didn’t know. If Alfrasco is hurtin’ for code, I’ll write them some.

In response, Jeremy Zawodny, a MySQL developer at Yahoo! counters: "Being good open source citizens means contributing where it makes sense..." In other words, what can open source do for Yahoo!.

VNUNet continues that aspects of Yahoo!'s design approach “requires the code to be tightly knit together and to include references to trade secrets...” Zawodny adds that Yahoo! simply does not want to disclose some of its code.

There'd be places in the code where magic voodoo functions are called but we couldn't really talk about what they do or how they might work. That's called our secret sauce or 'business logic' if you prefer. A good deal of that is kept under wraps for very legitimate reasons.
Wow, business reasons for not going open source...

Further, Yahoo! welcomed the possibility of receiving bug fixes but it does not have much to gain from volunteer developers adding features to Yahoo! Services. One reason according to Zawodny is that Yahoo! would be “beat(en) up for not integrating it (open source contributions) fast enough. It's tricky to introduce new features to a product that tens of millions of people are using."

Wow, technical reasons for not going open source...

posted by Noel Le @ 1:47 PM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(2)


Comments

Well, since the GPL has specifically allowed internally non-distributed code to be kept secret, they are keeping to both the letter and the spirit of the GPL.

Of course your goal here is try to stir up controversy within the GPL adherents, kind of functioning as an agent provacteur, but that hasn't worked in the past, so why should it work now??

Posted by: enigma_foundry at August 6, 2006 3:32 PM

My comments were aimed at the Alfrasco executive's statements on Google and Yahoo! not releasing source code rather than whether the GPL requires code disclosure for not distributed code (which I'm aware of).

My goal was not to "stir up controversy" among GPL adherents, but rather to point out a situation where businesses are called to release their source code, in the name of open source citizenship, where they have no business or technological interest for doing so.

Posted by: Noel at August 6, 2006 7:32 PM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page