Home Page
07.21.2006 (previous | next)
GPLv3 - Update

The community involved in the GPLv3 license revision effort conferred in Barcelona in late June. The presentations are now online, but the important one is Richard Stallman's, since he holds the ultimate pen on the license and will be the decider on what is in or out.

Stallman has not budged an inch on any of the controversial issues. The revision will be designed to make GPLv3 incompatible with DRM, to discourage patenting, to extend the viral application of the GPL as it applies to programs that interact with GPL'ed code, and to allow individual programmers to require sharing of code added on to GPLed programs by ASPs (e.g., Google). (See past posts on the issue -- go here and search for "GPLv3".)

I do not see how the commercial part of the open source community can live with these changes, given the extraordinary importance of the GPL, especially to Linux. The hostility to DRM will be anathema to the content creators, and the ASPs should react badly to any risk of being required to reveal their crown jewel secrets.

So, to me this looks like a slow motion train wreck for the open source community. But so far the world has taken little note, so maybe the corporate types at IBM, Google, Red Hat, HP, Sun, etc., know something that I don't.

Oddity: I accessed fsfeurope a couple of days ago, but now all attempts to connect from PFF fail, even though others can get through. So the above link should work for you, if not for me.

UPGRADE (12:42 p.m): FSF Europe is available again, and the link to the presentations has been upgraded into the deeplink.

posted by James DeLong @ 9:58 AM | Software

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(1)


Comments

Don't you think the most likely outcome if version 3 is a disaster is that prominent projects will just stick with version 2? Stallman doesn't have any way to force anybody to use version 3.

Posted by: Tim Lee at July 21, 2006 11:43 AM








 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page