Home Page
06.26.2006 (previous | next)
IP in China: not Perfect, but Important

A recent article cites that 72% of counterfeit goods confiscated by US Customs originated in China. That's not good news, especially if the legitimate manufacturers spend money in China.

In a previous post I suggested why China may not fully respect intellectual property rights. Adding to this discourse is a paper by London School of Economics fellow, Linda Yueh, in The Determinants of Innovation: Patent Laws, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in China (June 2006). Yueh's research looks at whether economic growth in China benefits from patent protection for foreign direct investments, and increased domestic R&D spending.

According to Yueh, before accession to the WTO, China tightly controlled foreign direct investment, requiring one of the following: that the foreign corporations have technology superior to that in China, explicit technology transfer agreements or that products arising from work in China be in demand on the global market. With current reduced oversight on foreign direct investment, China’s intellectual property laws increase in importance for sustaining foreign business interests in the country. Notwithstanding China's imperfect enforcement of intellectual property laws, Yueh finds that:

• growth in patents correlates positively with China’s economic development
• R&D spending and foreign direct investment positively impact the number of domestic patents filings
• a 1% increase in domestic R&D spending will increase the probability of patent filings by almost 5%, in areas of greater innovation activity, a 1% increase in R&D spending can increase the probability of a patent filing by as much as 10%
• foreign direct investment is “slightly less important” to innovation and patent filings than domestic R&D spending, but is associated with technology transfer and inflow of advanced technologies
• foreign direct investment correlates positively with domestic patent applications, due partially to the effect of spillovers on domestic enterprises
• as a country at a low level of economic development, China benefits more than other countries from foreign direct investment, which brings technology transfer and advanced technologies into the country

posted by Noel Le @ 11:34 AM | International, Patents

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page