Home Page
04.26.2006 (previous | next)
Smith Has it Right

Lamar Smith spoke words of wisdom at today's Cato conference, frankly saying far better than I could have some of the things I myself planned to say. The chairman of the House Judiciary IP Subcommittee (who was overly modest in his claim that he knows little about IP, he probably knows more than almost any member of Congress) lamented that the DMCA "is blamed for everything under the sun." He said instead it was "the foundation of our nation's digital economy." His points in defense of both the DMCA and DRM, protected under the Act:

* DRM can reach a balance with consumers. If Apple was overreaching with FairPlay, consumers wouldn't be buying iPods and downloading from iTunes.
* Without that DRM, the rights holders wouldn't have allowed those songs to be released.
* The marketplace can decide on DRM as consumers "vote with their wallets."
* The US Copyright Office has a triennial review to address these issues, and is doing its third now.
* Courts have struck down misuse of the DMCA (toner cartridges and garage door openers come to mind).
* A better solution would be to "go after the lawyers," and he would do so with his Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act that has passed the House and is waiting action in the Senate.

The chairman opened the conference with these words, and in my opinion no one provided an effective rebuttal to them the rest of the day. Perhaps that's why, as Zoe Lofgren said, there are only at most 4 or 5 members of Congress enthusiastic to reopen the DMCA.

On another note, before the conference began the chairman told me he hopes to act soon on orphan works. As I have written, I think the US Copyright Office has struck for the most part a workable balance in addressing this thorny issue; it's not perfect, but we can hope that the legislative process can improve it. Despite how much I love to bash Congress, anyone who knows Smith and his subcommittee knows that he listens to every possible argument and seeks to reach the broadest consensus possible. I expect nothing less on orphan works, as his recent hearing suggested.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 3:35 PM | Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain, DMCA, DRM & Watermarks, etc., Legislation and Legislators

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page