Home Page
04.13.2006 (previous | next)
Google Stands Firm on China

Google CEO Eric Schmidt reaffirmed the company's China policy.

"We simply don't have a choice but to follow the law," [he] told reporters at a launch ceremony in Beijing for the US Internet giant's new Chinese name, which translates to "Gu Ge."

"We must comply with the local law, indeed we have all made a commitment to the government that we will absolutely follow the Chinese law. We don't have any alternatives."

"It is not an option for us to broadly make information available that is illegal, inappropriate or immoral or what have you."

And I stick to my agreement with Google, expressed before in TCS Daily -- partly because it is important for Google to do its bit to bring information to China, even if this bit is sometimes truncated; partly because I am willing to believe that the Chinese leaders sincerely want to develop their nation, and achieving this without a meltdown is no easy task; partly because corporations are not supposed to run their own foreign policies; and partly because I think European and American democracy may well be on a path to ochlacracy (George Gilder's great word), and should refrain from lecturing other nations.

Schmidt praised China's rulers for their Internet strategy that has seen a huge online population develop.

"We look at the rise of China, the investment and the smart people and we are in awe of what has occurred here," Schmidt said.

"And we salute the government, key leaders in the industry and all of you who have made the rise of the Internet in China such a tremendous accomplishment."

So I'm still with ya, Eric -- even if, judging by my email on this topic, it's pretty much just you and me, and George Gilder, who made the following comment on my original TCS Daily story:

DeLong is trenchantly on target. The Chinese may well be on target. Google does best by pursuing profit.

With our incumbent protection laws, our ever expanding nomenklatura of lawyers, greens, and bureaucrats, our poll-driven agitprop, our free-speech fetishism (porn and spam enshrined along with incumbent politicians under McCain-Feingold), the United States may well be running its own democracy down into ochlocracy. Can Roberts and Alito turn the tide? Who knows? But US policies on the environment have driven most manufacturing and energy production off shore. Our economy is increasingly dependent on the Chinese, who have liberated more people economically than any other country in world history and now are leading the world in expansion of manufacturing and the construction of nuclear plants. They have tied their currency to the dollar. They have named their leading school of economics after supply sider Robert Mundell. They deserve some slack. Perhaps the pressure of their competitive example will liberate us.

George Gilder

posted by James DeLong @ 4:20 PM | International

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page