Home Page
03.14.2006 (previous | next)
Annals of Price Discrimination

Infectious Greed waxed wroth today about the news that Northwest Airlines will start charging extra for premiumn seats, such as front aisles and exit rows.

His commenters unanimously brought him back to his roots, though (IG is, after all, a blog for investors), by noting: "Clearly each seat on a plane has a different value; else there would be no need for advanced seat selection." So charge for it.

Also, the airlines have noticed that leisure travelers tend to pay less and book ahead, while business travelers pay more but book late. So cramming your frequent business travelers into the middle is not a way to keep your best payers happy.

United has done this for a while. Book the lowest fare and you are automatically assigned a middle seat. But if you pay an annual fee, you can get in the economy plus section, with five extra inches of leg room. One wonders about a business model that dictates making conditions so unpleasant that people will pay handsomely for a minimal amenity, but on the other hand, the airlines are not exactly getting rich, and assigning seats according to a market system makes a lot of sense.

Especially for me - PFF can't pay for First or Business Class, but I am willing to pay an extra $15 for a bit more room. As an IGer said:

I also hate being nickel-and-dimed, but in this case agree with the commenters: if there are seats that passengers “fight for”, that means those seats represent premium value, why not use a market-mechanism to assign them, vs. random luck.
And, of course, price discrimination is very useful to others (such as content purveyors), who can slice and dice their products in various ways to meet various preferences, to the benefit of all.

posted by James DeLong @ 1:35 PM | Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page