Home Page
02.28.2006 (previous | next)
Addendum on GPLv3 & Web Businesses (ASPs)

The following is being added to Tony Healey's Progress Snapshot GPLv3 and Web Businesses.

CLARIFICATION (Feb. 28, 2006): We were asked why a web services company (an ASP) would be required to disclose source code for technology it created itself. Here is Tony Healy's answer:

The disclosure requirement in GPLv3 would apply to web companies because many of them have taken advantage of having Linux source code to partially integrate their systems into the operating system, for performance and convenience reasons. Therefore their systems, or parts of them, are defined as enhancements of the Linux source code.

This is particularly the case with Google, which utilises the performance benefits of reaching into the operating system to speed up searching. An example of this work is described in a 2003 paper by Ghemawat, Gobioff and Leung describing the development of a scalable, fault tolerant distributed file system called the Google File System.* They corrected esoteric protocol mismatches that caused quiet failures, and contention between file and network locks that caused timeouts even under light load.

* Sanjay Ghemawat, Howard Gobioff, and Shun-Tak Leung, The Google File System, 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Lake George, NY, October, 2003.

(Corrected 02/28/06, 06:15 p.m.)

posted by James DeLong @ 2:49 PM | Software

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page