Home Page
01.26.2006 (previous | next)
Will L-EU-cy Move the Football Again?

In December, the EU sternly lectured Microsoft that the company had not been sufficiently forthcoming in providing technical information to competitors, in response to the EU's antitrust decree, and threatened to start fining the company 2 million Euros per day.

A couple of days ago Microsoft said, loosely translated: "Okay - we give up trying to figure out exactly how to make you happy. So we will simply reveal the basic source code. Then everyone can see everything." This would be an add-on to a previous offer to provide 12,000 pages of technical documentation and 500 hours of technical support to companies that wish to implement its server interoperability protocols.

Surely the EU is happy now? Actually, no, the Competition Commissoner said: "Normally speaking, the source code is not the ultimate documentation of anything, which is precisely the reason why programmers are required to provide comprehensive documentation to go along with their source code."

The EU is studying things. The Free Software Foundation is outraged, since access to the source code would only help people write programs that interact with Microsoft code rather than programs that replace code. Heaven knows what the competitors are saying.

The only question really is what the EU will think of next. I suggest they charge Microsoft with a new offense, entitled Malicious Compliance -- "You dastards! You did even more than we asked, just to deprive us of any rationale to prosecute you! That is intolerable insolence!"

posted by James DeLong @ 3:32 PM | International

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page