Home Page
10.12.2005 (previous | next)
Libertarians on IP: IP Alternatives

Libertarians opposed to IP rights on various grounds quite correctly note that there are alternatives to statutory IP rights. These include technological devices to contain IP, first mover advantages, contract-based systems for ensuring limited distribution and payment, tying IP to physical property or bundling it with another good (like advertising), and so on.

I won't survey those alternatives in detail here, but make some meta-observations.

First, I agree that there are alternatives to IP and that some of these are far less cumbersome than statutory IP. Far cheaper to make it hard or impossible to make multiple copies of a file or disk, than to wait for everyone to do so and then launch a lawsuit against every offending individual.

That said, tech-enforced boundaries can't do everything either. They can't do anything once they are breached, and breached they will be, especially if there is no rule that copying for distribution is illegal.

The other chief type of alternatives to IP are contractual (bundling IP with advertising, or with another service, and so on). But these are not notably less cumbersome than statutory IP, and may be more so. Who wants a 200 page contract stapled to every book or every tube of liniment? How do these contracts get enforced? What do you do about people who aren't parties to the contract? What do you do if there are gaps in the contract? Well, you go to court and the judge applies various rules of construction and fills in the gaps and ... lo and behold, we have a set a default rules for IP. We're right back where we started.

Essentially, though, the development of alternatives to legal IP concedes the point that some sort of framework is necessary in many (most) cases to protect incentives to create and invent. Either the anti-IP libertarian has to argue that these alternatives are as good as or better than statutory IP, or that no form of IP or IP alternatives are necessary. Both positions seem to me to be very weak.

posted by Solveig Singleton @ 3:04 PM | Liberty and IP

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page