Home Page
07.25.2005 (previous | next)
Dvorak and the Audacity to Criticize Creative Commons

Criticism of Creative Commons is about as well received by the CopyLeft as disparagement of Jesus Christ is by a Southern Baptist in the Bible Belt. (That is a region seemingly populated by few members of the Free Culture Movement; I didn't find any FCM missionaries while I visited relatives in East Tennessee last week). John Dvorak in a PC Magazine piece commits blasphemy with "Creative Commons Humbug," which drew the predictable gasps. Dvorak actually goes so far as to suggest that CC appears to be 1) unnecessary, 2) confusing and 3) perhaps harmful to those, like Dvorak, who want less restrictive copyright laws.

I'll leave debate on #3 to others. Is CC unnecessary? Of course it is, because any right given or forfeited through CC can be done without CC. Is it confusing? Well, at the risk of being a clueless dumb troll, I found the licensing process pretty complicated for something that bills itself as easy. At my urging, PFF published a book recently under a CC license, but figuring out exactly how to do that was a bit challenging. Certainly, as Dvorak mentions, it was far more challenging than merely putting a c with a circle around it on the book's first page.

Dvorak opens himself up to criticism with a column that lurches from argument to argument and employs less than constructive rhetoric. That's a shame, because I think he made some valuable points, but those will be lost in the sea of CopyLeft diatribes calling him a mean old luddite.

I have said in the past that I welcome CC as an alternative for artists to manage their rights. That said, for those who view CC as more than that, perhaps it would behoove them to develop slightly thicker skins. Both creators and users of licensed content would be well-served by a CC that was constantly being improved and upgraded -- similar to the arguments made about open source software -- but FCM zealots seem to feel that CC already has achieved an iconic status that puts it beyond criticism.

posted by Patrick Ross @ 2:59 PM | Free Culture Movement

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page