Home Page
04.14.2005 (previous | next)
WIPO & the "Development Agenda"

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) just concluded a meeting on a proposed Development Agenda by agreeing to two additional rounds of meetings.

Intellectual Property Watch described it as "a discussion of a proposal to more deeply infuse the needs of developing countries into the mission of the U.N. body," but the crafted ambiguity of this report conceals an important reality: the Agenda is an attack on IP rights as inimical to the interests of developing nations. (Further story here.)

Writing in NGOWatch, Professor Mark Schultz says:


[M]any opponents of strong intellectual property rights see this opening [of the Development Agenda] as a chance to advance proposals to change the world's intellectual property system radically.

One such proposal is for a treaty to promote "Access to Knowledge." Schultz continues:

Supporters contend that access to knowledge is a fundamental human right that should trump intellectual property rights and that limitations and exceptions to copyright and patent laws should be expanded greatly. Items being discussed include access to government funded research, proposals to encourage open access publishing models, free/open source software, problems with legally mandated copy protection and digital rights management, promotion of access to medicine, and proposals for a protocol on the transfer of technology and knowledge to developing countries . . . .
The Institute for Policy Innovation responds to this by saying:
We find strange the assertion that intellectual property rights somehow disadvantage small creators and developing nations. Intellectual property rights are, after all, RIGHTS. The granting of a right to a creator in a developing nation may be the only protection he has, and gives him economic leverage. We believe this is a good and moral thing. . . . We commend WIPO for its role in promoting development THROUGH the powerful tool of IP, and we encourage WIPO to remain committed to this goal.

posted by James DeLong @ 1:13 PM | International

Link to this Entry | Printer-Friendly | Email a Comment | Post a Comment(0)









 
IPcentral WebLog

Blog Main

IPcentral Blogosphere Archives

Search the Blog

Recent Posts
  - IP and Marginal Cost
- Academics and Copyright
- More on Jammie Thomas from DOJ
- More Studies of Downloading
- Facebook, MySpace, and Network Externalities
- Copyright and the University: An Academic Symposium
- Tyler Cowan on Chinese Movie Piracy
- More WHO Antics--Roger Bate Reports
- Patents, Meds, and the Developing World: Clips & Links
- Jermaine Dupri's Gripe with iTunes
Archives by Month
  - December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
  - (see all)
Archives by Subject
  - Academia
- Access: Commons, Fair Use, Orphan Works, Public Domain
- Accounting
- Analog Holes
- Antitrust
- Art
- Aspen
- Big Tent
- Biotech
- Books
- Comments from Readers
- Counterfeit
- Digital Americas
- Digital Europe
- Digital Europe 2006
- DMCA
- DRM & Watermarks, etc.
- Economics, Game Theory & Public Choice
- Enforcement & Remedies
- Free Culture Movement
- Games
- General
- Infrastructure
- International
- Internet: P2P, Search Engines...
- Legislation and Legislators
- Liberty and IP
- Markets: Business, Investment & Innovation
- Media: Video, Music...
- Patents
- Pharma
- Physical Property
- Prices, Terms, and Licensing
- Privacy and Security
- Radio
- Software
- Spectrum & Wireless
- Standards
- Supreme Court
- Tax-Funded IP
- Telecom
- Theft of Service
- Universities
Links
 

Site Feed

  - Atom
- RSS 1.0
- RSS 2.0
We welcome comments by email - look for a link to the author's email address in the byline of each post. Please let us know if we may publish your remarks.


 
Home Page